What this report measures
We count only canonical clinic URLs that pass the same evidence gate as our sitemap. The report excludes duplicate listings, unpublished candidates, raw review text, author details, ratings, and ranking scores.
First-party research
Review data coverage report
A dated view of the source-backed analysis behind KANBI’s published clinic pages. This is a coverage report, not a clinic ranking or a medical assessment.
Latest analysis snapshot: July 6, 2026Newest source-review date: July 4, 2026
45
Verified database records
6
Canonical pages meeting the publishing gate
6
Published pages with source-backed analysis
833
Review bodies used in those analyses
A verified database record is not automatically a published page. KANBI removes duplicate aliases and requires inspectable review bodies plus a non-synthetic analysis before a clinic URL is included here.
Depth of the published analysis corpus
Each page appears once, using its latest active analysis snapshot. These bands describe review bodies used for analysis, not a platform’s visible all-time review total.
- 0–29 review bodies
- 0
- 30–99 review bodies
- 1
- 100–299 review bodies
- 5
- 300+ review bodies
- 0
Confidence labels in the published corpus
- High
- 0
- Medium
- 5
- Low
- 1
- Insufficient
- 0
Freshness labels in the published corpus
- Fresh
- 0
- Recent
- 2
- Stale
- 4
Source-platform mix
This is the aggregate mix of review bodies used in the published analyses. Each snapshot is reconciled to its analysis total; unrecognized or inconsistent platform attribution is grouped as Other / unclassified source records. It does not represent every review that a platform displays.
| Platform | Review bodies used |
|---|---|
| Naver | 538 |
| 231 | |
| Tribeau | 43 |
| Kakao Map | 21 |
How to read the numbers
“Review bodies used” means the text KANBI collected and used for an analysis snapshot. It is different from a platform’s public total, which may cover a different period or set of posts. A snapshot date is also different from the newest review date in its sources.
What this report cannot tell you
Public reviews are not representative samples and are not clinical evidence. This report does not recommend a clinic, guarantee quality or outcomes, or determine whether any procedure is suitable for an individual.